Kurosawa and Shakespeare: Are they One?
        Taking a deceptively involved look into the minds of the sole creators, who bring in the supreme reign everyplace the worlds of foreign film and drama, do we begin to scratch the step up with some of the most compelling and intricate arguments surrounding green goddess of Blood and Macbeth. Are rear of Blood and Macbeth rather unstained equals of one another? Why does Kurosawa receive so a good deal recognition when all he has done is piggy-back the most famous drama writer of all time? These are questions elevated repeatedly, and are at the fore front of some of the best debates of all time. According to Andrew McLean, Peter Brook observed that the Throne of Blood is perhaps the only true masterpiece godlike by Shakespeare, but it substructurenot properly be considered Shakespeare because it doesnt use the school text (McLean p.71). Michael Mullin has suggested that Kurosawas film is a thing in itself. (McLean p.71)
        In looking at within Kurosawas Throne of blood and Shakespeares Macbeth, Macduff is portrayed to that of a peasant, real having no true bearing within the realm of the story, on with the murder of his followers. Cathy Cupitt goes on to say that with Macduff portrayed as a peasant, it ...destroys the heroic and righteous moral ending of Macbeth.
Instead we have the much more ambiguous mass assassination. This can be sympathize as the ultimate betrayal in a fundamentally corrupt society, or it can be read as a hopeful assertion of the power of the working class against the corruption of their leaders (Cupitt p.1). According to Andrew McLean, ...Kurosawa has left both the intent and effect of Shakespeares Macbeth behind (McLean p.71). Kurosawas Throne of Blood can be seen as moral depiction of man, and the decisions he encounters in building the...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment