Copyright New York Times Company Dec 25, 1991
To the Editor:
Tom Wicker reaches the ravish conclusion (column, Dec. 1) in c on the wholeing for abolition of the Electoral College because it business leader undemocratically produce the wrong winner. Only three times in our history has the bankruptcy of the ordinary select aim President, and just once could the Electoral College be blamed.
In 1824 intraparty factionalism and a political deal resulted in the choice of John Quincy Adams by the House of Representatives, though Andrew Jackson got 42 percent of the democratic vote to Adamss 32 percent. Voting fraud and Reconstruction-era politics gave the election of 1876 to the Republican Rutherford B. Hayes, though 51 percent of the popular vote went to the Democrat Samuel J. Tilden.
In 1888 the Democrat Grover Cleveland won 92,000 more popular votes than the Republican Benjamin Harrison, but Harrison got 58 percent of the electoral votes. This odd outcome was possible because of Clevelands huge but otiose popular margins in the Democratic South while nearly losing the large industrial states of the North.
In none of these contests was the victors right to reign over seriously challenged. But if only popular votes are counted, the loser in a race as close as those of 1960, 1968 and 1976 might well demand a recount. The Electoral College has deliver us from such crises of legitimacy because giving the winner all of a states electoral votes usually magnifies the popular vote winners margin.
Without the winner-take-all linguistic rule power would shift from large heterogeneous states, which tend to river basin their popular votes fairly evenly between the two major parties, to smaller more homogeneous states, where Presidential candidates could build bigger popular pluralities. Ethnic, racial and religious minorities that often vote as...If you desire to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment