The terms cannot be defined unless in context, because the definitions have changed over time. Keep in mind; in the 1970s it was taboo for a relationship to exist between 2 people of the same sex or diverse race. Nowadays, theyre tolerated at the very least.
The terms race, class, gender, and sexuality are as well as socially constructed, meaning that the dominant group assigns value to the different definitions of race, class, gender, and sexuality. For example, in the united States in the 1950s, it was common for middle class white Americans to be considered good, whereas non-white Americans living in privation were to be considered bad or charge dangerous.

Moreover, they are defined by power relationships wherein the dominant culture exerts power over the minority cultures through defining a circumstantial race, class, gender, or sexuality and thus excluding from the societys resources or something of this sort.
Weber also explores the relationship between the social organization of race, class, gender, and sexuality and then the effect that has on the individual. For example, in the United States in the 1970s, the middle class was almost exclusively make up of white heterosexual families and the upper class even more so. Today, the middle and upper classes are available to every race or sexuality. Because the middle and upper classes are more diverse, there is less value given to terms kindred race or gender.
Finally, Weber expresses the fact that all of these terms are continuously...If you want to get a full essay, hostel it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment