1. The debate of the reburial of excavated Native American sites has been going on for quite some time now. I believe that the wealthiness of knowledge gained from these discovered artifacts and bones yield much to a greater extent valuable information than just placing them back into the ground, causing them to be lost forever. The system of Pre-Columbian Native Americans should not be reburied and should be studied and documented for the sake of history and a better understanding of it. After m any(prenominal) years of loot of Native American burial sites, the Federal Government found The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) in 1990 and is the primary federal legislation pertaining to graves and human remains in archaeological contexts. It was created to protect cemeteries on federal and tribal lands, and to provide a way to return the human diminished material and associated funerary objects in the nations scientific and museum collections to culturally affiliated tribes. . However, I feel this act forces archeologists to halt advance investigations and possibly damages lost records of history. Returning these artifacts and bones prevents them from beingness preserved and checked for inaccuracies, which, at that point becomes the sole creditability from the researcher.
once these are placed back to their original site, new technologies in the lab and additional investigations are useless in their get down to 2. gain a better understanding of the culture and grow of the evidence. Genetic research on past civilizations requires hard evidence-bones and somatogenetic artifacts, not photographs. In many cases, the bones cannot be returned simply because the ancestry notation is missing somewhere along the line and no living person can prove any relationship. Many claims are made that the bones belong to a certain... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment