Head Injuries Resulting to Brain Tumors

203206) conducted a long term study of 2,953 persons to followup after orchestrate impairment to investigate the association in the midst of head trauma and the ensuant development of intracranial tumours. The study found that the evidence does non support an etiological association between head flaw and the later(prenominal) development of hit tumors (Annegers, Laws, Kurland, and Grabow, 1979, pp. 203206). Although the study sample was large, the congeneric rarity of mastermind tumors created a statistical situation in which the researchers were non able to absolutely refute the potential for head hurt to predispose an individual to the development of a caput tumor (Annegers, Laws, Kurland, and Grabow, 1979, pp. 203206). The researchers did conclude, however, that the risk is very small that head fault will lead to the consequent

development of a headway tumor (Annegers, Laws, Kurland, and Grabow, 1979, pp. 203206). The researchers also found that the occurrence of subsequent brain tumors was not associated with either the severity or the location of a head crack (Annegers, Laws, Kurland, and Grabow, 1979, pp. 203206). Annegers, Laws, Kurland, and Grabow (1979, pp. 203206) also found that head injury does not appear to be a significant etiological factor in the development of meningioma. Meningiomas " are the most habitual benign brain tumor, and constitute about 15 share of all primary brain tumors" (Black, 1991, p. 1555). Intere

Demaerel, Wilms, Lammens, Nuttin, Plets, and Baert (1991, 349351) examined one single individual with brain tumor. The researchers concluded that the epidermoid tumor in the 41 course of study old male content could have been caused by an earlier head injury (Demaerel, Wilms, Lammens, Nuttin, Plets, and Baert, 1991, 349). Epidermoid cysts are rare and benign tumors (Demaerel, Wilms, Lammens, Nuttin, Plets, and Baert, 1991, 349). This trial determined that the 41 year old male subject had suffered a head injury at the site of the epidermoid tumor 30 years prior to the development of the tumor (Demaerel, Wilms, Lammens, Nuttin, Plets, and Baert, 1991, 350).

The researchers stated that it "is commonplacely accepted that ET (epidermoid tumor) may also follow injury due to inclusion of carapace (Demaerel, Wilms, Lammens, Nuttin, Plets, and Baert, 1991, 351). Such a general attribution, however, is not present in the literature, most studies reject any strong link between head injury and the subsequent development of brain tumors (Miller, 1994, pp. one hundred one102). Further, it is important to note that Demaerel, Wilms, Lammens, Nuttin, Plets, and Baert (1991, 349351) based their finding on the examination of a single individual with a brain tumor.

Black, light beam McL. (1991, 23 May). Brain tumors. (First of two parts). New England Journal of Medicine, 324(21), 14711475.

The general consensus of the literature is that head injuries may lead to the development of about rare forms of primary brain tumor, but that the likelihood that such(prenominal) a causal relationship exists is quite low. There is no contention in the literature that head injuries lead to the subsequent development of metastatic brain tumors. With respect to primary brain tumors, some researchers contend that head injuries may lead to the subsequent development of benign primary brain tumors, but not to the subsequent development of malignant primary brain tumors. Further, the merely types of benign primary brain tumor
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!